Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

The new strengths Antonelli has shown in F1, 12 months on from 'reaching the bottom'

Formula 1
Belgian GP
The new strengths Antonelli has shown in F1, 12 months on from 'reaching the bottom'

How Estonia crowned Pajari as the WRC’s new flying Finn

Feature
WRC
Rally Estonia
How Estonia crowned Pajari as the WRC’s new flying Finn

What we can learn from Mercedes' floor after Russell's Belgian GP retirement

Formula 1
Belgian GP
What we can learn from Mercedes' floor after Russell's Belgian GP retirement

The important lesson Solberg put into practice in Estonia

WRC
Rally Estonia
The important lesson Solberg put into practice in Estonia

Wolff admits Mercedes has most powerful F1 engine – and Red Bull agrees – as ADUO returns to spotlight

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Wolff admits Mercedes has most powerful F1 engine – and Red Bull agrees – as ADUO returns to spotlight

Citroen Formula E team boss Cyril Blais dies aged 43

Formula E
Citroen Formula E team boss Cyril Blais dies aged 43

Belgian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Belgian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

Welcome to the jungle? When Formula 1.5 came to Spa

Feature
Formula 1
Belgian GP
Welcome to the jungle? When Formula 1.5 came to Spa

Mercedes: Low downforce choice would have been slower for us at French GP

Mercedes does not believe that going down the low downforce route that Red Bull has taken for Formula 1’s French Grand Prix would have helped it do better in qualifying.

Valtteri Bottas, Mercedes W12

Max Verstappen pulled off a surprise pole position at Paul Ricard on a track where Mercedes has been dominant in the past.

The Dutchman’s form was helped by Red Bull electing to run its low downforce rear wing configuration, which helped boost its speed on the straights.

But while Mercedes acknowledged that Verstappen was gaining an advantage thanks to his extra top speed, it does not think it would have been faster even with less downforce and drag.

Mercedes boss Toto Wolff told Sky Sports F1 about Red Bull’s low downforce choice: “We believe, that as far as simulation [tells us], it was the slower version.

“You can see they were fast in the straight line. If we are bolting on the low downforce wing, we will be losing in the corners much more.”

Red Bull team principal Christian Horner reckoned the rear wing disparity between his team and Mercedes explained the differences in pace over the lap.

“We’ve taken a bit of downforce out of the car, you can probably see by the size of the rear wing between us and the Mercedes,” he told Sky Sports F1.

“We’re using less energy in Sector 2, so we’re going faster down the straight because we’ve got less resistance there.

“We’re still managing to do a very good time in Sector 3, so that’s helping us to generate a competitive lap time around here. Hopefully we’ll be good for the race tomorrow.”

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB16B

Max Verstappen, Red Bull Racing RB16B

Photo by: Zak Mauger / Motorsport Images

Wolff said that the ultimate problem for Mercedes was that it has been lacking pace compared to Red Bull – irrespective of downforce levels.

“[It’s a] difficult weekend because we are just lacking pace,” he said. “That's the truth. It looked much worse than at the end [where] we ended up, but we just need to gain everywhere. There's not one part that we are not looking at, in order to improve our game.”

As well as a smaller rear wing helping Red Bull down the straights, the team is also running fresh Honda engines for this weekend’s French GP.

Previous article Hamilton happy to disprove Mercedes chassis swap "myth"
Next article Verstappen: Red Bull didn't expect to be this good in French GP qualifying

Top Comments

Latest news