Skip to main content

Sign up for free

  • Get quick access to your favorite articles

  • Manage alerts on breaking news and favorite drivers

  • Make your voice heard with article commenting.

Autosport Plus

Discover premium content
Subscribe

Recommended for you

Belgian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Belgian Grand Prix Driver Ratings 2026

Welcome to the jungle? When Formula 1.5 came to Spa

Feature
Formula 1
Belgian GP
Welcome to the jungle? When Formula 1.5 came to Spa

IndyCar Nashville race postponed to Monday after heavy rain and World Cup delays

IndyCar
Nashville
IndyCar Nashville race postponed to Monday after heavy rain and World Cup delays

Momentum restored: Antonelli overcomes bad luck to reclaim control at the Belgian GP

Feature
Formula 1
Belgian GP
Momentum restored: Antonelli overcomes bad luck to reclaim control at the Belgian GP

Hamilton keeps F1 Belgian GP fourth-place finish as mechanic escapes unhurt

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Hamilton keeps F1 Belgian GP fourth-place finish as mechanic escapes unhurt

Ferrari criticises "mega harsh" penalty for Hamilton in F1 Belgian GP

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Ferrari criticises "mega harsh" penalty for Hamilton in F1 Belgian GP

What maiden WRC win means for Pajari

WRC
Rally Estonia
What maiden WRC win means for Pajari

Why Leclerc wasn’t penalised for clash with Piastri in Belgian GP

Formula 1
Belgian GP
Why Leclerc wasn’t penalised for clash with Piastri in Belgian GP

Symonds to stay in F1 tech role for ‘a good while’ after postponing retirement

Pat Symonds plans to continue as Formula 1’s chief technical officer for “a good while” after delaying his planned retirement in 2022.

Pat Symonds

Symonds has been working with F1 to help shape its technical regulations and improve on-track racing since 2017, playing a significant role in the new car designs that debuted last year.

At the end of 2021, it emerged that Symonds and F1 technical boss Ross Brawn were both set to leave their roles at the end of the 2022 season once the new technical regulations had completed their first year. 

While Brawn stepped away from F1 and retired from motorsport, Symonds has remained with the organisation after opting to postpone his planned retirement.

“I had a plan to retire last summer,” said Symonds in a talk at Autosport International's business forum on Friday. 

“I actually handed in my year’s notice. You have to think about these things.

“My notice was accepted, and then Stefano [Domenicali, F1 CEO and president] got to hear about it, and he was like, no, I don’t think it’s a good idea!

“So I’m still here, still doing it, and I still will be for a good while yet.”

It means Symonds will be the most senior figure from the F1 organisation working on the next revision of the technical regulations, which are due to arrive in 2026. The organisation works alongside the FIA’s technical team, led by head of single-seaters Nikolas Tombazis, to put together the regulations.

Pat Symonds, Chief Technical Officer, Formula 1

Pat Symonds, Chief Technical Officer, Formula 1

Photo by: Carl Bingham / Motorsport Images

Last year’s technical overhaul was the first to enjoy significant involvement from F1 as a commercial rights holder, with Liberty Media eager to improve the on-track product and create more racing action.

The intention of the revised ruleset in 2022 - the biggest shake-up F1’s rules had seen in decades - was to make it easier for cars to race wheel-to-wheel and attempt overtakes by reducing the amount of dirty air that cost downforce. It was something most drivers felt had been largely achieved, praising the improved feel of the cars when in battles.

Symonds was previously part of a technical working that formed the regulations for 2009, but said it was like “a college project compared to what we did for 2022”.

“We put together a really talented team, very small team, and we really went back to basics,” Symonds explained.

“We had the two objectives. One was to make the wake behind the car more benign, because you can’t get rid of it, it’s going to be there. And then secondly, accepting that there was a wake and trying to produce a car that was running in that wake to be less affected than in the past.

“Generally speaking, I think we got it right. We’ve seen a few different solutions, the cars looked different, the drivers were very complimentary. The statistics, for want of a better word, showed the cars were running closer together.

“So yeah, I think it’s been a reasonable success.”

Previous article Wolff: New Hamilton F1 deal will be sorted in a "few hours"
Next article McNish: 2026 rule changes offer Audi ‘good runway’ for F1 entry

Top Comments